I believe my two best blogs from this quarter are One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Dead Fish and Twitter Threats and You.
One Fish would probably be the better of the two. i seemed to stay coherent throughout the whole post and stayed on topic. I also used examples from something I’m passionate about as my other sources and main topic. It referenced an article that was read in class the previous week to lay the foundation for the rest of the post. The embedded images were relevant to the topic I was talking about. It was written in the blogging style of having an air of informalness.
Twitter and You would be my other example blog. It was bout how far people can exercise their freedom of speech on the internet. The idea was started from the article about the super big douchebag that got banned form twitter. The post references another example of a girl who made a joke threat and then got arrested. The embeddded picture is relevant to the post. Other sources are inline linked.
Comment 1 and comment 2 are examples of comments that helped fuel the discussion. They were relevant to the topic of the article often addressing the end food for thought questions. They gave my impression of the topic and portrayed how I felt on the topic.
Online Activism is popular way to spread the word about a cause or issue. The speed of the internet and how fast people communicate with each other makes spreading the word about an issue easy and efficient. People will initiate the cause by posting a video or picture post that triggers people to look into it more and try to find some background information. From Jenkins’ chapter, “the hope is that such provocative videos will encourage greater information seeking, inspiring those who encounter them to follow links back and to drill deeper into the content-rich sites that these activist groups have constructed around them.” This refers to the Bil’in protesters who painted themselves blue in reference to the characters from the movie Avatar. They did this because they believed they were fighting the same conflict as the movie. Their cause spread far and wide reaching all kinds because of the social currency at the time of the Avatar movie. It was big in pop culture at the time and the use of relevant pop culture is a good way to reach all kinds of people. Sometimes it’s hard to have your cause reach everyone because of the issues it addresses. The Bil’in example was about humanitarianism and people’s rights and these issues routinely hit the eyes and ears of most people on the internet.
However, there are issues that only a certain group of people have an interest in such as saving Bristol Bay. There is a proposed open pit mine, one of the largest in the world, to be constructed In Alaska by the headwaters of two of the largest rivers that feed Bristol Bay. Bristol Bay is one of the largest sockeye and king salmon fisheries in the world, and a mine at it’s source would put the entire fishery in danger. Everyone that relied on this fishery for a living or recreation started opposing it hard. Online petitions started showing up on fishing forums and blogs and conservation groups started lobbying against it.
This all started back in the mid 2000s and eventually the mine got put on hold after one of the major North American partners dropped out due to all the negative reaction to it. The project didn’t die however and new partners are being sought after. The project is basically in hibernation and an article from Midcurrent, an independent provider of fly fishing news, literature and advice, advises to still be aware of the dangers that it could still happen.
Before the internet, there is a strong possibility that this mine would have been built, since it would be located in a far off location that few Americans would be aware that it existed. With the internet, word spread and people became aware and they decided they didn’t want a large mine threatening wild waters with toxins and pollutants. This was all done through people sharing videos, stories and information of the bay, and having people donate and sign petitions.
Bristol Bay is just one example of internet activism making a difference. Have you been a part of an activism that other people might not be aware of? Is there anything you’ve read about or experienced that could have been made better if people had just been made aware of the issue?
Recently, we learned the difference between viral media, spreadable media, and sticky media from the excerpt of the book Spreadable Media. What most of us call viral would actually classified as spreadable. Adorable cat videos that your friends post all over your social media feeds are an example of spreadable media. Your friends found them and they appealed to them so they wanted to share them with you in hopes that you’ll enjoy them. Opposing spreadable media is viral media that holds true to its name. This media comes in the form of such things as pop ups and diverted web pages. A person doesn’t go looking for it, it just shows up and spreads itself through clicks in the right places.
Where viral media uses trickery and lies to spread itself, spreadable media needs to convince actual people that it’s worth sharing. The following graphic from Harvard Business Review shows why the sharers of a particular video shared the video.
From the chart, opinion seeking is the biggest reason why people share. The video made an impression on them and they want to see if their friends and associates have either a similar opinion or possibly even a dissenting opinion. The other top reasons for sharing, social utility and conversation starting, also revolve around a sharer’s friends. With this tidbit of information, the best way to make a video, picture, or hashtag go viral is to make it so that people will want to share it with their friends and their friends share it with their friends and so on until it’s everywhere, like loose glitter.
Another aspect of getting spreadable media to launch is to launch it from the right location(s). A video of rabbits playing hockey loaded only to YouTube might go ‘viral’, but it’ll take a long time for someone to sift through the millions of videos on YouTube and find it and then share it. If you load your rabbit hockey video to YouTube and then link it to every access point you have on the internet, then it has a better chance of spreading. Eventually someone of note on the internet will find it and post the hockey bunnies to their blog or site that has hundreds of thousands of followers and then it becomes glitter.
Just think of places you were introduced to ‘viral’ videos on the internet; chances are it was on a popular site. Have you ever seen a ‘viral’ video before it was ‘viral’? Have you ever posted something that was found later on somewhere you didn’t expect to see it?
This past week we talked about online harassment and in what ways occurs. According to Pew Research Center’s online harassment summary, about three quarters of adult internet users have either witnessed or experienced online harassment. Online harassment varies from less severe name calling and embarrassment to the more severe form of threats and stalking. The article discusses who experiences the different forms of harassment and where they are most likely to encounter it; however, the articles doesn’t really go into much depth of how people should deal with harassment. When it came to the less severe forms of harassment like name calling and rude comments a lot of us where of the opinion of just to ignore it.
The newest episode of South Park, Safety Space, addresses Online Harassment and offers it’s own way to deal with it. Cartman posts a shirtless picture of himself and is then upset when he reads all the mean replies about him being a fat-ass. In South Park fashion the obvious solution to the harassment is to have someone run his accounts and filter all his social media comments and give him a daily report of only the nice comments. This task falls on Butters who ends up running the accounts of several insecure people and celebrities and creating their safe space, a place where its only supportive nice things and nothing mean. It makes a statement that the internet is a cruel place and that no one is really invincible from ridicule on the internet and that a lot of it shouldn’t be taken so seriously.
However, there are instances where internet harassment can’t be ignored or shouldn’t be ignored. In the John Oliver segment about online harassment, he talked about the more serious forms of harassment such as threats and revenge porn. The internet has advanced so much faster than the laws that help regulate it that things like revenge porn and serious threats are still possible and there’s not much that can be done to prevent it or punish the culprits. These acts leave people feeling traumatized and helpless, which are feelings nobody want, especially from the internet.
I’m all for freedom of expression on the internet and everything, but to a certain degree. There’s no way to ever stop name calling and trash talk but once harassment gets to the point where it affects someones life it’s crossed the line. The only true way to stop harassment is to disconnect from the internet when possible; especially if someone doesn’t want to deal with it or can’t deal with it. The sad thing is that online harassment isn’t going to go away, because the internet is too free of a medium. If the internet gets monitored to the point where all harassment stops, the internet is basically lost as an outlet of expression. Would you be willing to give up internet freedom for a less hostile environment in some situations? Has harassment affected you, or ever ruined your internet experience?
What amount of freedom with your speech are you really allowed on the internet? Everyone in the United States has a right to say what they want without threat of punishment, given to us by the first amendment.
People usually interpret this as they can say anything they want, against whoever they want, whenever they want. This is not true. The amendment protects your right in regards tot he government, not that guy you really don’t like down the street. this idea is also contested on the internet. Social websites, where people can post anything they’re thinking, are a hot spot for this debate. in an article from the Washington Post, a twitter user known for being a “far-right mega-troll”, was banned for allegedly threatening someone over twitter. He fought the ban, but lost because twitter is a private industry. As a private industry twitter can set it’s own rules on how people should behave and conduct themselves on their platform. Charles Johnson, the user that was banned, behaved in contrast to how Twitter wants their users to behave. He threatened someone and whether or not it was meant to be serious it was still a threat and Twitter acted upon it. Another instance of people crossing the line with their internet behavior is when a teenager made a threat to American Airlines over twitter.
American Airlines did not take it lightly she ended up getting arrested. Even is she meant it jokingly, it was not taken lightly. This is just another instance of people saying what they want whether it’s serious or not and having it backfire on them.have you ever been banned from a website or received repercussions from something you said online? Do you always think over a comment or post before actually posting it? Unlike what I do with my blogs.
Wikipedia is fastly becoming the top location for someone to learn something new or research on the internet. According to the “Define Gender Gap?” article, Noam Cohen reports that 53 percent of adult internet users use Wikipedia as a research source. This is back from 2010 so that number has most likely grown since then. The thing is though, is that Wikipedia is a peer based encyclopedia that can be edited and changed by anyone with an internet connection. Contributors usually provide knowledgeable information that is accurate but sometimes there is a jokester that decides to abuse their editing powers and add misinformation. For example, someone decided to edit the page for a children’s book with false albeit funny facts.
With all the unrestricted access to articles that people can edit, they can change history to say whatever they want. In the clip from the Colbert Report about Wikipedia he changed articles to show how easy it was to edit an article to a belief rather than a fact. His modified the article about George Washington , so that it said he never owned slaves and he made a statement that the elephant population is rapidly increasing. Both of these changes actually happened on the site. According to an article written after the show people kept changing elephant related articles so much that Wikipedia actually locked the articles. We all were tasked with making our own changes to a Wikipedia page and it just didn’t seem right that it was so easy to do. Especially how we’re all used to having to make accounts and register on other websites to do anything. Do you trust everything you read on Wikipedia? Have you ever contributed anything major to Wikipedia? Was there anytime you came across misinformation on Wikipedia?
The delivery of information is adapting to the fast paced, low focus attitude of the interwebs. Before, information and facts could be delivered through articles and lengthy reports, but as people started jumping from website to website faster the delivery of information had to change. The infographic was developed to adapt to this. Not only are they easy to skim over and read, bu they’re designed to be mobile across the internet. It’s easy for a person to see one a particular website then post it to there own website. For example I could find a website that lists the top places to go fly fishing and then try to list those destinations and describe them on my own site here or use a link to take you away from my site, which I wouldn’t want. With an infographic like the one below though, you get all information without it being edited by me and you stay on my site.
They’re also designed to be visual appealing to catch the eye and make you stop and read them. While they look pretty, they might not always be accurate. The above infographic is subjective as there isn’t really any hard data behind it. It’s really just a culmination of the opinions of many fly fishermen wand where they really had a good fishing experience. On the other hand, infographics that try to convey data and facts should be given a good look over before accepting what they’re presenting. The article “Infographics Lie” shares with us three steps to assess an infographic: check the data presentation, check the data source, check the data alterations. Infographics without sources should be taken with a grain of salt nd should be double checked through other sources before using the presented information in reports. Do you regularly belief information from infographics. Do you think this a good way to share information in today’s world?
I’m one of the few people that I know and socialize with that still has a “dumb pone” or a phone that is able to text and make calls and that’s about its limit of usefulness. As someone that doesn’t have all the distractions a smartphone offers, I feel like I have a different view of the world compared to smartphone users. In the times when most people are looking at their screen, I’m watching the world around me. When classmates and I arrive early to a class, while we’re waiting, most of the time their phones come out and they immerse themselves in that handheld world of theirs. I, on the other hand, just usually resort to letting my mind wander and people watching. I don’t view these times as “moments when I’m completely alone” like the girl who wrote the unplugged article. During these times I try to see what’s going on around me and become part of someone else’s world for a short time though a wave, a few shared words, or some awesome awkward eye contact. Just like the girl that wrote the article, I still have a problem with being away from my phone for too long. It’s not that I don’t know what to do with myself, I feel like I might miss some important text or phone call. God forbid it’s a phone call, because then I’ll have to be the person who initiates a phone conversation.
My favorite part about having a non-smartphone is when people tell me to look something up or perform an action my phone is incapable of doing, I look them dead in the eye, pull out my phone , and just start forcefully tapping my screen until they realize what’s going on. I also love dumb phone durability. I’ve dropped mine on so many occasions onto concrete, once from a fire escape twenty feet in the air and it still keeps on trucking. Also people’s reactions when they see what kind of phone I have. It’s pretty similar to this scene from Parks and Rec
Does having a smartphone make everyday life easier? Are there ever any times that you find you wish you had something simpler?